Magnet Stability:

the reversible temperature coefficient.

by Dr. Peter Campbell


We have derived the demagnetization curves of permanent magnets in previous Sections, and have showed actual curves for some of the most popular materials in Section 2A. It was apparent that, while the characteristic shape of each curve is retained as the magnet's temperature varies, the curve's position relative to each axis changes. In terms of a magnet's intrinsic demagnetization curve, its magnetization +Msat and its intrinsic coercivity -Hci are both changing with temperature. Because BroMsat, the magnet's "normal" B vs. H curve will move by virtue of both its remanence Br and its coercivity -Hc changing with temperature.

Whatever flux density we expected the magnet to provide at room temperature, this will be different at any other temperature, directly affecting the performance of the device in which the magnet is installed. Furthermore, in Section 1C we warned that the "knee" in the demagnetization curves represents the onset of a reversal of the material's magnetization, but now we see that the position of the "knee", and hence the threshold for magnetization reversal, is dependent upon temperature.

Change in Remanence

If a magnet delivers flux density B corresponding to a point on its B vs. H curve which is below the "knee", the reversal of some of the material's magnetization will require a remagnetization of the magnet to restore its full saturation magnetization Msat. In this case, it is said that the magnet has suffered an irreversible loss, because although the condition is in fact reversible with full remagnetization, this is not usually something a user can perform on an assembled device. However, if the magnetic properties vary with temperature without causing the magnet to operate at a point on the B vs. H curve which is below the "knee", then the magnet is only suffering a reversible loss, since the original operating condition is fully restored when the temperature returns to its normal level. The latter reversible condition is explained in this Section.

Magnetization M is the bulk material property, defined in Section 1A as the sum of the magnetic dipole moments µm per unit volume.

curie temp.M will assume its saturation value of Msat when all the µm are aligned. Increasing temperature thermally agitates the dipole moments, disrupting their alignment and reducing M below its Msat level. At a sufficiently high temperature, there is enough thermal agitation to yield no net alignment of the µm, so that M completely disappears. This critical value is known as the Curie Temperature Tc, which is a fundamental parameter of every magnetic material. This general relationship between M and temperature T is illustrated in the diagram to the right. Permanent magnet materials are likely to have better thermal stability if they contain constituent elements with higher values of Tc, the most commonly used being:

Ni: 358oC
Fe: 770oC
Co: 1120oC

Since BroMsat at room temperature, the remanence at elevated temperature is the new value of flux density for the condition when a magnet now develops no magnetizing force (H=0). Therefore, the relationship between Br and temperature follows the same form as the diagram above. Furthermore, as a practical matter one doesn't want a permanent magnet material to operate anywhere close to its Tc, so Br will gradually change over the normal range of operating temperature as illustrated. This was seen in each set of demagnetization curves in Section 2A , by looking at the characteristics' intercepts with the B-axes. It is seen again in the demagnetization curves shown below, which are for another grade of fully dense anisotropic neodymium-iron-boron.

NdFeB

temp. changeBy plotting the intercepts of these curves with the B-axis, we can see the change in Br with temperature. The decline is approximately linear up to some transition temperature (almost 200oC for this neodymium-iron-boron grade), above which there is a rapid degradation in Br. This linear region is a reversible loss, whose slope is known as the reversible temperature coefficient of Br (α) for the material. Above the transition temperature, the magnet is suffering an irreversible loss, such that Br does not recover its original value upon return to room temperature. This irreversible loss is easily visualized from the set of demagnetization curves above, which clearly show the "knee" approaching the B-axis as the temperature rises towards 200oC.

The reversible temperature coefficient of Br (α) is defined as the percentage deviation in Br from its value at room temperature (%/oC). Typical values for the permanent magnets described in Section 2A are:

ceramic
ferrite
sintered
SmCo5
sintered
Sm2Co17
fully dense
Nd2Fe14B
reversible temperature coefficient of Br, α -0.20 %/oC -0.045 %/oC -0.03 %/oC -0.10 %/oC
Curie Temperature, Tc 450 oC 750 oC 825 oC 310 oC

From the Curie Temperatures of the constituent elements, it is clear that cobalt-based alloys should have better temperature stability than iron-based alloys, and indeed the Table above confirms this. The problem is, of course, that cobalt is a much more costly element than iron.

Change in Coercivity

The change in a magnet's coercivity Hc with temperature will depend upon the changes occurring both in Br and in Hci. In Section 1B, we derived the intrinsic coercivity for a magnet with magnetocrystalline anisotropy as:

We would therefore expect that, as temperature rises and M falls below its Msat level, Hci will increase. This is indeed what happens with ceramic ferrites, whose actual characteristics strongly adhere to magnetocrystalline anisotropy.

However, with the samarium-cobalt and neodymium-iron-boron materials described in Section 2A, Hci is seen to decrease with temperature. This is not specifically due to nucleation or pinning complicating the magnetocrystalline anisotropy mechanism. The cause is at the atomic level, where magnetic moments µm of the rare earth elements are themselves strongly temperature dependent, and (since K1 = 8µoµmM) K1 is no longer constant but will control the change in Hci via the equation above.

While it was possible to assign an approximately constant value to the reversible temperature coefficient of Br (α), the changes in Hci and hence Hc are not as easy to predict, so the actual demagnetization curves should be used to study these parameters.


Copyright © 1999 by Princeton Electro-Technology, Inc.
All rights reserved.